To further drive our discussions, we will address 2 key questions:
1. What is a Christian
2. What is the Market Place
A Christian can be defined as one who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ” and follows up with the application. In other words “A hearer and doer of the Word of Jesus Christ
On the other hand, a Market Place can be defined as a sphere considered as a place where ideas, thoughts, artistic creations etc. compete for recognition
These 2 answers give us an initial mandate for a Christian in the Global Market Place:
As Christians in the Global Market Place our main role is to communicate the ideas, thoughts, beliefs and teachings of Jesus Christ wherever we find ourselves and to make them relevant to any domain we find ourselves in.
So, what exactly does relevant mean and what prevents us from being relevant. Another interesting question but one that needs to be addressed if we are to replicate the impact of the 12 men that were so relevant during their brief spell on earth that we are still reading and talking about them today
Every day we wake up and get on a mode of transport to get to work, I guess nowadays it’s a case of switching on our laptops. Either way we are preparing to provide our skills and services to an industry sector. The key sectors for the times that we are facing now are the following:
· Health and Social Care
· Education and Child Care
· Utilities and Communication
· Food and Necessary Goods
· Transports
· Key Public Services
· Public Safety and National Security
· National and Local Government
When we consider the global mandate laid down by Jesus thousands of years to have dominion and also to be salt and light; can we considered ourselves relevant each time we enter the arena of the Global Market Place.
Are we making lasting footprints each time we walk into the office or switch on our laptops?
Years ago, I engaged in a discussion with a friend of mine regarding ways in getting our children engaged. We identified a litmus test which will involve 2 rooms hosting different subject contents on TV.
The first room will be tuned into the Disney Channel and the other room with TV content provided by the church. Children will be given the option of staying in either of the rooms based on their individual preferences.
We both came to the same conclusion that based on the current society that we live in; majority of the children would go to the Disney Channel room.
What does Disney Channel know that maybe as Christian we have failed to realise?
Is it safe to conclude that Disney have a way of identifying the relevant protocol to attract our children as part of their programming strategy?
Is it safe to also conclude that Disney like Jesus know how to capture the heart of children – in all segments?
The Bibles demonstrates this in Matthew 19 v 14 - Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these."
Interesting statement as we see that Jesus welcomes the children rather than being an obstacle to them.
So the question bears asking
Could our irrelevancy to the world in terms of contributing to the ecosystem of children be because our church programs are irrelevant and hindering?
Something to ponder on as we continue our discussions.
Now what does relevance mean?
I find the definition of relevance by Webster as very befitting for the theme of our discussion:
Practical and especially Social applicability
Earlier we mention the role of salt and light as key ingredients for relevancy – This raises some other important questions:
Is our presence as Christians in the global marketplace preserving society?
Are we impacting society with loving and godly counsel that brings transformation and relevance?
How do we construct a framework that will enable us to discern the components of relevancy and not make the same mistakes that the Jewish Community made when Jesus brought the relevant message of the gospel to Jerusalem?
Music Break
It has to start with a Vision and the Vision has to be from God who controls everything above the earth and under the heavens.
Below is an extract from the Book – The Founding of Harvard College
After God had carried us safe to New England, and we had built our houses, provided necessaries for our livelihood, reared convenient places for God's worship, and settled the civil government; one of the next things we longed for and looked after was to advance learning and perpetuate it to posterity; dreading to leave an illiterate ministry to the churches, when our present ministers shall lie in the dust.
And as we were thinking and consulting how to effect this great work, it pleased God to stir up the heart of one Mr. Harvard (a godly gentleman and a lover of learning, there living among us) to give the one-half of his estate (it being in all about £ 1,700) toward the erecting of a college, and all his library.
After him, another gave £ 300; others after them cast in more; and the public hand of the state added the rest.
The college was, by common consent, appointed to be at Cambridge (a place very pleasant and accommodate) and is called (according to the name of the first founder) Harvard College.
This could explain why Harvard University is one of the most sought after institution of higher learning in the world and we can now understand why; when you consider the mandate and guiding principle, the school was established upon.
We mentioned the importance of a vision earlier. Some of the schools guiding principles are the following:
· Let every student be plainly instructed and earnestly pressed to consider well the main end of his life and studies is to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life (John 17:3)
· Lay Christ in the bottom as the only foundation of all sound knowledge and learning.
· Seeing the Lord only gives wisdom, let everyone seriously set himself by prayer in secret to seek it of Him (Prov. 2:3).
· Everyone shall so exercise himself in reading the Scriptures twice a day that he shall be ready to give such an account of his proficiency in the following:
o Theoretical observations of the language and logic
o In practical and spiritual truths, as his tutor shall require, according to his ability
o Seeing the entrance of the word giveth light, it giveth understanding to the simple (Ps. 119:130).
· That they refute all profanation of God's name, attributes, word, ordinances
· During times of worship, study with good conscience, carefully to retain God and the love of His truth in their minds.
· Let them know that (notwithstanding their learning) - God may give them up to strong delusions, and, in the end, to a reprobate mind (II Thess. 2:11, 12; Rom. 1:28).
So, what is the Vision and the guiding principles that God has given us as Christian to leave an impacting legacy that will continue to transform the Earth into the Lord’s Kingdom?
What vision and guiding principles do you operate from to make you relevant in the global market place?
The next case study gives us a detailed understanding of the importance of having a vision or a divinely inspired picture upon one’s heart and a mission statement for more clarity when communicating to people your relevancy in life.
In October 1784, Wilberforce embarked upon a tour of Europe which would ultimately change his life and determine his future career.
During this time, Wilberforce explored afresh the spiritual principles he had first encountered in childhood through the influence of his aunt and the Methodists.
He started to rise early to read the Bible and pray and kept a private journal.[41]
He underwent an evangelical conversion, regretting his past life and resolving to commit his future life and work to the service of God.[12]
His conversion changed some of his habits, but not his nature: he remained outwardly cheerful, interested and respectful, tactfully urging others towards his new faith.[42]
Inwardly, he underwent an agonising struggle and became relentlessly self-critical, harshly judging his spirituality, use of time, vanity, self-control and relationships with others.[43]
Wilberforce's involvement in the abolition movement was motivated by a desire to put his Christian principles into action and to serve God in public life.[78][79]
He and other evangelicals were horrified by what they perceived was a depraved and un-Christian trade, and the greed and avarice of the owners and traders.[79][80]
Wilberforce sensed a call from God, writing in a journal entry in 1787 that "God Almighty has set before me two great objects, the suppression of the Slave Trade and the Reformation of Manners [moral values]".[81][82]
As we can see from the case studies above – for the framework to be relevant, it has to involve a vision, mission and core values that comes from God.
So what exactly are Core Values? The next case study gives us some further insight:
When a Christian stand to defend his beliefs in a court room, his testimony becomes quite critical, for the court has said a man cannot hold his beliefs if he cannot describe them. A belief is not a hunch. It is not a feeling or an “it seems to me.”
There are people who have gone to the witness stand and after stating what they believe are asked, “Well, why do you believe that? Can you show me that in the word of God?”
Some do not even know if what they believe is there, but reply with “it sort of seems to me.”
The problem the court has with a “well, it seems to me,” is that feelings change rapidly and as a consequence, a hunch or a feeling, or an “it seems to me” will not be honoured.
In a court of law, a defendant must be able to state his beliefs from the Bible orally. The court does not expect eloquence, but it does expect the defendant to be able to explain his or her beliefs in a simple and concise manner.
It also requires knowledge of those beliefs. This becomes important because often we like to hide behind a title.
We may claim to be a “separated fundamentalist” or “a Christian,” which are descriptive terms that may have to be described more fully.
In the matter of beliefs and believers, the court realized there must be a test to determine which beliefs are upheld and which beliefs will not be honoured and protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
In 1972, the court came down with such a test. Ironically, that test case involved Christian education. An Amish man who lived in the state of Wisconsin by the name of Jonas Yoder told the state that he would no longer send his children to the state school.
The state of Wisconsin advised him that he must, to which he replied, “I don’t think you hear me. I am not going to send my children to your school.” Mr. Yoder was threatened with being sued if he refused to comply but still he refused.
He was warned that if he was sued and if the state won the case, he could go to jail. His only response was that he would not send his children to the school. Even under the threat of losing his children, he refused to change his mind, explaining that his religious beliefs prohibited him from complying with the demand.
Mr. Yoder did not fare very well in court. He lost the case and was told that now that he had had his day in court, he must comply with the ruling. He still refused, never altering his position and he found out something very interesting.
After losing his appeal, his case went to the U. S. Supreme Court, where Mr. Jonas Yoder was told that the First Amendment protected him, and he was not required to send his children to the state school.
This case laid down the test that was to be used for all subsequent cases to determine which beliefs are to be protected by the First Amendment and which are notThe first definition the court made was, “Every religious belief is one of two types. It is either a conviction or a preference.”
Most Christians carelessly use the word conviction. In reality, the test of whether or not a matter is a conviction is a very severe one and not to be taken lightly. It will be seen here that most of us possess only preferences.
A preference is a belief that is held with such intensity that a person can go into full time service in the name of that belief. He can be a minister of the gospel, a Christian schoolteacher or a missionary. He might even give all of his wealth to it and the court decides he still has only a preference.
His belief may energize him to stand on a street corner and witness and proselytize, but it would still only be a preference. If a belief can change under some circumstances, the court calls it a preference. True conviction cannot be changed!
A conviction is something that you purpose in your heart, as a fabric of your belief system. It is one that you will not change due to any circumstance. It says, “When you believe that your God has required something of you, you will withstand all of the tests put to you.” It has been said that a man is never made by a crisis. The crisis exposes the man for what he already is.
There are parallels to this in the history of the three Hebrew children in the book of Daniel. When taken into captivity, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego purposed in their hearts not to defile themselves. It was something about which they determined with resolve.
So as a Christian in the Global Market Places – can you truly show that your core values that govern your behaviour are based on a preference or true conviction.
We have established from Harvard University, William Wilberforce and the case of Jonas Yoder the importance of having a Vision, Mission Statement and Core Values or guiding principles in being relevant in the global marketplace as a Christian.
Next we shall look at a famous court case that shows the relevance of Christian principles in coming up with its final judgment
Also known as the "Paisley snail"[5][6] or "snail in the bottle" case, the case involved Mrs Donoghue drinking a bottle of ginger beer in a café in Paisley, Renfrewshire.
A dead snail was in the bottle. She fell ill, and she sued the ginger beer manufacturer, Mr Stevenson. The House of Lords held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to her, which was breached, because it was reasonably foreseeable that failure to ensure the product's safety would lead to harm to consumers.
There was also a sufficiently proximate relationship between consumers and product manufacturers.
Lord Atkin commented that he did "not think a more important problem has occupied your Lordships in your judicial capacity, important both because of its bearing on public health and because of the practical test which it applies to the system under which it arises".[12]:43
He agreed with counsel, based on his own research, that Scots and English law were identical in requiring a duty of care for negligence to be found and explained his general neighbour principle on when that duty of care arises.[7]:40–41
“ At present I content myself with pointing out that in English law there must be, and is, some general conception of relations giving rise to a duty of care, of which the particular cases found in the books are but instances.
The liability for negligence, whether you style it such or treat it as in other systems as a species of "culpa," is no doubt based upon a general public sentiment of moral wrongdoing for which the offender must pay.
But acts or omissions which any moral code would censure cannot, in a practical world, be treated so as to give a right to every person injured by them to demand relief.
In this way rules of law arise which limit the range of complainants and the extent of their remedy. The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour; and the lawyer's question, Who is my neighbour? receives a restricted reply.
You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law, is my neighbour? The answer seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question."[12]:4
This case study in law mirrors a scenario in the Bible when on one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus.
“Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
“What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[a]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b]”
“You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”
But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side.
So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he travelled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him.
The next day he took out two denarii[c] and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’
“Which of these three do you think was a neighbour to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”
The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”
Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
The cases we have discussed prove the point that as Christian we can be relevant and influential in the Global Market in our words, thoughts and deeds.
These cases have also shown that a belief system based on Jesus Christ can be relevant, influential and applicable in the domains associated with the Global Market Place.
To conclude this exploration on the spiritual relevance of a Christian in the Global Market Place, I will look to the book of Ecclesiastes to give the Conclusion of the Matter:
Not only was the Teacher wise, but he also imparted knowledge to the people. He pondered and searched out and set in order many proverbs. The Teacher searched to find just the right words, and what he wrote was upright and true.
11 The words of the wise are like goads, their collected sayings like firmly embedded nails—given by one shepherd. Be warned, my son, of anything in addition to them. Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body.
Now all has been heard.
here is the conclusion of the matter:
Fear God and keep his commandments,
for this is the duty of all mankind.
14 For God will bring every deed into judgment,
including every hidden thing,
whether it is good or evil
The spiritual relevance of a Christian in the Global Market Place be based on the Fear of God and an adherence to his commandments which can be found in his Word. That the Word remains a lamp unto his feet and a light unto every path, step or decision that he takes!